This is from an older post of mine, but is still relevant...
The ALS, PLS, PMA Name Debate
Gowers, a founder of British neurology, stated in 1899 that he had never encountered a single case of PMA in which the pyramidal tracts (UMN) were unaffected. He did not think the introduction of the term “ALS” by Charcot (founder of Neurology) to be very helpful because it implied that the primary lesion was degeneration of the pyramidal tracts and that atrophy of anterior horn cells was secondary. He felt that Charcot's distinction in effect gave a new name to an old disease. He concluded that PMA, PBP, and ALS were "essentially one disease."
Brain in 1933 introduced the term "motor neuron disease" so that apparently different conditions could be brought together in a single general category and used the terms “motor neuron disease” and “ALS” interchangeably.
A series of studies have supported the opinion that PMA, PLS, and PBP were subsets of ALS.
Swank and Putnam in 1943 analyzed 197 patients. They considered PLS and PMA to be ALS that had yet to develop fully.
Lawyer and Netsky in 1953 did an analysis of 53 patients with ALS and concluded that motor neuron diseases form a group that includes PMA, PLS, ALS, and PBP.
Mackay in 1963 reviewed 126 patients with ALS and concluded that regardless of the onset, the spastic forms nearly always become atrophic, the atrophic also spastic, while the spinal forms nearly always become bulbar, and the bulbar forms, if the patients live long enough, become also spinal. The entire group is, therefore, best regarded as a single degenerative disease, ALS, which constitutes a spectrum of atrophic process at one end, spastic at the other, and both in the center. With time, cases at each end of the spectrum move towards the center.
This is where most neurologists appear to be today—with PLS (UMN signs only) on one end of the spectrum, PMA (LMN signs only) on the opposite end of the spectrum and ALS (UMN and LMN signs) in the middle, to which both ends are drawn.
Problems
1) MND, since Brain introduced the term has been used interchangeably with ALS which makes the term confusing at best.
2) The billing codes do not agree with current neurologic thinking. Instead
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is 335.20
Progressive muscular atrophy is 335.21
Primary lateral sclerosis is 335.24
And Motor Neuron disease is coded 335.2, which is different from ALS’s code, though the man who coined the term didn’t differentiate between the two.
The Real Problem
The real problem is that, while all the above diseases should be called ALS, the bureaucrats don’t understand that. ALS carries major benefits, while sometimes the terms, PLS, PMA and even MND may not. BUT THEY SHOULD. It is up to you to make sure your billing is coded correctly. Talk to your neuro about the coding problem and if he won’t agree with most other neuros that PLS, PMA and ALS are all the same thing (ALS) then keep fighting with him or find another neuro.