Thanks @"patrick123" for clarifying this.
I know certain MND classification would not qualify for S.S. benefits. That's the case when your Neurologist diagnoses PLS (which has better prognosis than ALS) or "other MND" which is clearly not a definite ALS diagnosis.
At least you found out your Neurologist made a mistake with the diagnosis and it was fixed for you so you can receive your benefits.
------------
@ "lgelb":
Would you mind letting me know about all those "other threads/posts" by me, where I supposedly "misled" people and you "corrected" me?
I don't come here to mislead people spreading misinformation. I try to be as accurate as possible and, if I don't know the answer to a question, I usually refrain from posting until I can find a credibly source where I can back up my claims.
I do know that, to qualify for S.S. disability benefits in the USA, you need to have worked at least "40 quarters of coverage" (equivalent to 10 years of work).
And, while some people may not qualify for these benefits (those who never worked in their lives and, those who became disabled before completing the "40 quarters"), there are still other people who qualify for benefits. That's why I asked "patrick123" why was he denied benefits.
What really puzzles me is your arrogant attitude stating something like: "Despite me correcting your previous posts, you are still repeating misinformation"...to conclude with this: "I really worry that I am going to miss one of your posts and someone is going to be misled"...
How many times have you "corrected" me here?
If you have evidence to back up that claim, I cordially invite you to provide l-i-n-k-s to such posts.
If you need to oversee me every time I post something to make sure I wouldn't be "misleading" somebody with "misinformation", you are cordially invited to do so.
Just be mindful that even when I have ALS, I don't spend my whole day here 24/7 in these forums because I have hobbies where to spend my precious spare time.
Regards,
NH