ALSBurger
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 16
- Reason
- Learn about ALS
- Country
- US
- State
- Bizness
- City
- Nonya
I have been having a lot of difficulty nailing down the answer to this one question.
"Does ALS ever start with twitching in the absence of clinical weakness?"
You may feel this is a closed topic, but from what I've seen, its not.
I have read more than two individuals on here who plainly stated their first symptom was twitching. Not weakness. Not atrophy. Of course the entire BFS community clings to the hope that its "impossible" to have twitching without clinical weakness AND ATROPHY ....
I really would like to know how accurate that is. Clearly there is some shade of gray. Probably a percentage. What is that percentage?
I just dont understand why certain people are making it a "rule" when it really doesn't seem to be. If I spend 10 minutes on here and found 2 diagnosed individuals who are the exception to that "rule" then surely there are more....
If it is a hard and fast rule, *WHY* to neurologists ask twitchers to come back in 3 months? Or 6 months? Or to follow up in a year? Why have some neurologists stated that they don't fully rule out ALS until the 2 year mark?
I am trying to differentiate between "feel good" comments that make people stop stressing.... versus *reality*.
Reality would be much appreciated.
"Does ALS ever start with twitching in the absence of clinical weakness?"
You may feel this is a closed topic, but from what I've seen, its not.
I have read more than two individuals on here who plainly stated their first symptom was twitching. Not weakness. Not atrophy. Of course the entire BFS community clings to the hope that its "impossible" to have twitching without clinical weakness AND ATROPHY ....
I really would like to know how accurate that is. Clearly there is some shade of gray. Probably a percentage. What is that percentage?
I just dont understand why certain people are making it a "rule" when it really doesn't seem to be. If I spend 10 minutes on here and found 2 diagnosed individuals who are the exception to that "rule" then surely there are more....
If it is a hard and fast rule, *WHY* to neurologists ask twitchers to come back in 3 months? Or 6 months? Or to follow up in a year? Why have some neurologists stated that they don't fully rule out ALS until the 2 year mark?
I am trying to differentiate between "feel good" comments that make people stop stressing.... versus *reality*.
Reality would be much appreciated.