Alex123
Distinguished member
- Joined
- May 31, 2014
- Messages
- 128
- Reason
- PALS
- Diagnosis
- 05/2014
- Country
- US
- State
- California
- City
- Los Angeles
ALS has traditionally been considered a neuromuscular disease. But besides the fact that eventually it may have to be considered as a group encompassing many different diseases, it may also have to be considered a multi-system disease which affects more than just the voluntary muscles.
As a neuromuscular disease, ALS seems to appear "out of the blue" and the person affected most of the time considered him/herself as a healthy individual. But if we look at ALS as possibly affecting other parts of the body besides the voluntary muscles, we could think about the possibility that, if this was a process that started way before the first recognized ALS symptoms appeared, there might have been signs that something was not entirely normal.
In the case of other neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, I think researchers believe today that there are things that start to change 10 or 20 years before it becomes apparent that the person has the disease. Perhaps some day the same conclusion will be drawn with respect to ALS.
I am starting this thread as a place to share our thoughts and experiences with respect to this possibility. Some of the symptoms apparently not related to ALS may in fact not be related but just a coincidence. It is hard to know and nowadays only statistical studies could give us some hints. In the future when the biology of ALS disease is better known, there might be other ways to figure out if some process leading to the disease starts many years before.
I have many symptoms in mind but I am afraid that if I mention them this conversation might be too biased towards those symptoms. So I'll leave my comments for later.
As a neuromuscular disease, ALS seems to appear "out of the blue" and the person affected most of the time considered him/herself as a healthy individual. But if we look at ALS as possibly affecting other parts of the body besides the voluntary muscles, we could think about the possibility that, if this was a process that started way before the first recognized ALS symptoms appeared, there might have been signs that something was not entirely normal.
In the case of other neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, I think researchers believe today that there are things that start to change 10 or 20 years before it becomes apparent that the person has the disease. Perhaps some day the same conclusion will be drawn with respect to ALS.
I am starting this thread as a place to share our thoughts and experiences with respect to this possibility. Some of the symptoms apparently not related to ALS may in fact not be related but just a coincidence. It is hard to know and nowadays only statistical studies could give us some hints. In the future when the biology of ALS disease is better known, there might be other ways to figure out if some process leading to the disease starts many years before.
I have many symptoms in mind but I am afraid that if I mention them this conversation might be too biased towards those symptoms. So I'll leave my comments for later.