ptich
Distinguished member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 171
- Country
- US
- State
- California
- City
- Mountain View
I found this article summary, from 2005:
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/162/12/1146
There is no definition what "rate ratio" means, so I may be wrong, but this article seems to imply that male programmers are 4.55 times more likely to have ALS than the general population. There was a lot of talk of vets having higher chances of ALS, and their chances were like 30-50% higher; seems that the programmers are in much worse situation... The study had covered 507 male ALS cases, which apparently makes its findings quite significant statistically.
Not that I would recommend my kids to become programmers anyway, but now programming looks like a very dangerous occupation (in addition to being quite unprofitable to begin with )
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/162/12/1146
There is no definition what "rate ratio" means, so I may be wrong, but this article seems to imply that male programmers are 4.55 times more likely to have ALS than the general population. There was a lot of talk of vets having higher chances of ALS, and their chances were like 30-50% higher; seems that the programmers are in much worse situation... The study had covered 507 male ALS cases, which apparently makes its findings quite significant statistically.
Not that I would recommend my kids to become programmers anyway, but now programming looks like a very dangerous occupation (in addition to being quite unprofitable to begin with )