My mother was diagnosed with ALS a few months ago and there are aspects of both the disease and the diagnosis that she is finding very challenging to accept. I am sure this is "normal" but seeing as I can't even begin to pretend like I know how she is feeling, I am hoping that maybe someone who can actually relate can give some insight.
It seems like at random, she will go from accepting that she has ALS to believing there is a chance they are wrong and it is something else. I can't help but hope its something else, of course, but I also don't want to encourage false hope.
On the ALSA.org site it states...
A comprehensive diagnostic workup includes most, if not all, of the following procedures:
•electrodiagnostic tests including electomyography (EMG) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV)
•blood and urine studies including high resolution serum protein electrophoresis, thyroid and parathyroid hormone levels and 24-hour urine collection for heavy metals
•spinal tap
•x-rays, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
•myelogram of cervical spine
•muscle and/or nerve biopsy
•thorough neurological examination
She's had a neurological examination and a second opinion.
In May 2013 she had her first EMG, which came back normal, however when it was repeated six months later it came back abnormal.
She had the NCV test done.
MRI was done and came back not showing anything.
Myelogram of cervical spine was done (This is a CAT scan, right?)
She did have blood taken, however she admits she does not know what it was being tested for.
They did not do a urine test, no muscle or nerve biopsy has been done and no spinal tap has been done.
So at least 5 out of the 10 were done, possibly 6, but as I said she's unsure about what was the blood work was tested for.
A few days ago, she also went to a naturopathic doctor. They took blood and sent it out for testing in the US (she is in Canada) for lyme, even though she does not believe that lyme has anything to do with ALS. I got the impression that she was more hoping the naturopath could help with her colitis or provide her with natural products that may help with some symptoms and that she may have ultimately gotten pressured into the blood test.
I guess what I am really wondering is how normal is it to be diagnosed without having a urine study, biopsy or spinal tap?
She is struggling so much with her insurance company and their refusal to cover anything and pushing her to go back to work. I don't want to be encouraging her to try and get this other testing done if it is just redundant. Do these tests test for diseases that the other ones would not have covered?
I appreciate anyone taking the time to give some input...Good bad or otherwise. I'm going to forward everything over to her, she's not really tech savvy but this way she can read the feelings, thoughts and experiences of people who have been there.
It seems like at random, she will go from accepting that she has ALS to believing there is a chance they are wrong and it is something else. I can't help but hope its something else, of course, but I also don't want to encourage false hope.
On the ALSA.org site it states...
A comprehensive diagnostic workup includes most, if not all, of the following procedures:
•electrodiagnostic tests including electomyography (EMG) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV)
•blood and urine studies including high resolution serum protein electrophoresis, thyroid and parathyroid hormone levels and 24-hour urine collection for heavy metals
•spinal tap
•x-rays, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
•myelogram of cervical spine
•muscle and/or nerve biopsy
•thorough neurological examination
She's had a neurological examination and a second opinion.
In May 2013 she had her first EMG, which came back normal, however when it was repeated six months later it came back abnormal.
She had the NCV test done.
MRI was done and came back not showing anything.
Myelogram of cervical spine was done (This is a CAT scan, right?)
She did have blood taken, however she admits she does not know what it was being tested for.
They did not do a urine test, no muscle or nerve biopsy has been done and no spinal tap has been done.
So at least 5 out of the 10 were done, possibly 6, but as I said she's unsure about what was the blood work was tested for.
A few days ago, she also went to a naturopathic doctor. They took blood and sent it out for testing in the US (she is in Canada) for lyme, even though she does not believe that lyme has anything to do with ALS. I got the impression that she was more hoping the naturopath could help with her colitis or provide her with natural products that may help with some symptoms and that she may have ultimately gotten pressured into the blood test.
I guess what I am really wondering is how normal is it to be diagnosed without having a urine study, biopsy or spinal tap?
She is struggling so much with her insurance company and their refusal to cover anything and pushing her to go back to work. I don't want to be encouraging her to try and get this other testing done if it is just redundant. Do these tests test for diseases that the other ones would not have covered?
I appreciate anyone taking the time to give some input...Good bad or otherwise. I'm going to forward everything over to her, she's not really tech savvy but this way she can read the feelings, thoughts and experiences of people who have been there.