to stop motor neurons from dying
Hello Shane
1) Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter (people often refer to neurotransmitters as "chemicals") in the brain and GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter.
Theoretically speaking, if a neuron releases GABA onto a neuron that releases glutamate, it could inhibit the release of glutamate from that neuron. Glutamate excitotoxicity is thought to be a mechanism in ALS.
Having said that: there was a study done back in 2000 that investigated GABAergic drugs (only one that I know of) but there were no follow-up studies. That more than likely means it didn't work. I'll admit that I haven't read the study in a lot of detail, but I will try to find some time in the near future and give you a more informed opinion.
2) Stem cells will more than likely play a big role in curing ALS . . . BUT . . . what stem cells do is more or less take-on the properties of the cells they replace.
What will most likely need to be done before the stem cells work to cure diseases like ALS, is to "fix" the underlying pathology that is causing the motor neurons to die. If not, the stem cells will more than likely just become the same dying cells. The promise is certainly there.
Right now I don’t know much about GABA however I like the truth and the reality of your comment, where you say “What will most likely need to be done before the stem cells work to cure diseases like ALS, is to "fix" the underlying pathology that is causing the motor neurons to die. If not, the stem cells will more than likely just become the same dying cells.
This is why I am flying the flag for the “brain glutamate scavenger / transporter”.
No matter what opinion any one has on ALS there is hardly any argument from those in the know that Glutamate is involved. This is why the development of glutamate scavengers that will transport excess glutamate from the brain to where it can do no harm is so important.
Possibly it is not a cure but in simple mathematics less glutamate in the brain must mean less excitatory activity and this must go a long way towards slowing down progressions.
Although unlikely, If however it does nothing at all to help ALS then we win anyway. We win because it will simply prove the Glutamate theory wrong and force academia and science to rethink everything. It will also mean that science has wasted and continues to waste time and in the wrong direction.
It’s a win / win situation.
But how can PALS achieve this?
wirky