Barbie4 said:
Does anyone know how soon you get the results of an EMG test? Do you get the results right after they do the test or a few days later?
With an EMG, can they tell always whether the upper neurons and lower neurons are affected, by doing one test or do they have to do other tests to check both?
once you are officially diagnosed with ALS, what happens next? Do they put you on medication right away? Do you have to see a bunch of specialists or stick to the ALS clinic neurologist.? Do you have to have a bunch more tests?
My friend goes on Wednesday for an EMG and a breathing test and I was just wondering whether she will come home with results or will have to wait.
Thanks
Barb
Answering your questions in the order asked-
--The results of the EMG are known immediately. Whether they are reported immediately depends on who performed it. My EMG was performed by an ALS specialist, because the referring neurologist strongly suspected ALS based upon my clinical history. When I asked for the results, he told me right then that I "probably" had ALS but that more tests were needed to rule out other possibilities.
--I have been told that an EMG only detects lower motor neuron damage. Basically, what the EMG shows is if there is both "active" and "chronic" denervation, that is, are the muscles losing contact with the nerve that is supposed to serve them; the EMG also will show if there is "reinnervation", that is, whether there are "complex motor unit potentials"- this is because in motor neuron disease, when motor neuons become diseased, neighboring motor neurons will "sprout" additional connections to serve the muscle which the diseased nerve was supposed to serve, i.e, "reinnervate" it. I have been told that upper motor neuron damage is much more difficult to spot and must be seen in clinical observation. One thing they will do is test the feet for the "babinski" reflex- that is, when the bottom of the foot is manipulated, if the toes spread out and up, that is evidence of upper motor neuron damage. So is "hyperreflexia", that is, reflexes in a limb that has been weakened which are greater than normal.
--There is no conclusive test for ALS. It is a "differential" diagnosis made by checking for motor neuron damage with the EMG, ruling out other causes through tests such as an MRI, and by clinical observation. Without progression of weakness it is unlikely to be ALS.
--Once the diagnosis is made the neurologist should, if competent, discuss all options. A second opinion is always an option particularly if the diagnosis is not by an ALS specialist. Rilutek will be offered- it is a somewhat controversial drug because the testing showed it to be of modest benefit and if you don't have insurance it can be very expensive (I'm taking it but other ALS patients reject it). If your neuro is an ALS specialist ask his/her opinion as to the usefulness of the drug. Physical theapy, occupational therapy, and other services are offered based on how advanced a case it is.
The ALS patient will also be offered innumerable opportunities to be relieved of their money by this scheme or that one. My advice is to use the common sense you were born with. You don't lose that when you get ALS.
(Good Lord, I've become an ALS know-it-all, how obnoxious is that

)