DPS study report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nikki J

Moderator
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
8,760
Reason
PALS
Diagnosis
04/2014
Country
US
State
MA
City
Boston
Thanks for posting the report. I heard those results a while ago and find them very discouraging. It is true that some of the ALS experts I know have been unsupportive of this technology. But we all know PALS who believe they benefited including members of this forum. It will be interesting to see the results of the US trials
 

BlueandGold

Senior member
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
629
Reason
PALS
Diagnosis
04/2015
Country
US
State
WV
City
Sandyville
I heard those results a while ago and find them very discouraging.
Indeed. One of these days we are all going to be able to celebrate good news and the posts will light up!

Vince
 

Atsugi

Moderator emeritus
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
5,189
Reason
Lost a loved one
Diagnosis
12/2010
Country
US
State
FL
City
Orlando
Good God! It's hard to imagine that DPS would be that destructive. I'm glad to hear it improved QOL for some of the people on this board, though.

I guess we learn from failure as much as we learn from success. We must keep trying.
 

azgirl

Senior member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
956
Reason
PALS
Diagnosis
12/2013
Country
US
State
AZ
City
Tucson
So disappointing. Crossing it off my list. My Dr pushes non invasive methods as proven to extend life
 

lgelb

Forum Supporter
Moderator
Joined
Nov 5, 2009
Messages
8,331
Reason
Lost a loved one
Diagnosis
00/0000
Country
US
State
WA
City
Seattle
As the authors conclude, the findings do not exclude subgroup benefit. I suspect wide variability in if/how BiPAP was used among treatment and control groups, as well as in the historical controls used in the HDE approval study, is part of the conflicting results, as well as sampling issues inherent in any big ticket device trial in a terminal disease.

Reviewers have been noting since the HDE was granted that there are some fundamental mechanistic concerns in ALS (what are we doing to the dying battery -- quite different than spinal cord injury), so this remains an individual context/decision, not a slam dunk.
 

djbailey

Forum Supporter
Distinguished member
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
100
Reason
Lost a loved one
Diagnosis
03/2014
Country
US
State
SC
City
Mount Pleasant
We were advised by Mayo of the results a few months back and given the option to continue in the US study or stop. My wife decided to stay in the study as we think it has help her. If you graph her results of FVC it is a fairly straight line decline until implementation of the DPS. At that time the slop of the decline levels slightly and continues in a straight line again. Believe it will only result in a few month additional time, however it does indicate a benefit and the study needs to be done so others know if the risk if worth the effort. Mayo indicated they only had one person drop from the study
 

Atsugi

Moderator emeritus
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
5,189
Reason
Lost a loved one
Diagnosis
12/2010
Country
US
State
FL
City
Orlando
... Believe it will only result in a few month additional time, however it does indicate a benefit...
Thanks, DJ. I'm glad someone benefited. --Mike
 

hjlindley

Senior member
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
760
Reason
PALS
Diagnosis
10/2011
Country
US
State
VA
City
Richmond
I had a long discussion with my pulmonologist. He pointed out that the diaphragm is only 40% of breathing, the rest comes from the intercostals which Exhale the CO2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top