ktmj
Distinguished member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 421
- Country
- US
- State
- Dixie
- City
- Redneck
Let me try to describe a realistic, but hypothetical situation and get some reaction (sorry, my brain just works this way - too analytical)...
I know docs measure strength on a scale when they do a clinical exam, but it seems impossible for them to really measure strength the way they do until there is profound weakness. Let's invent a scale from 0 to 100.
Patient A is a woman of healthy weight that does not exercise other than normal hard-working daily activities. She might start on the scale at 55.
Patient B is a hard-working construction worker male of healthy weight (sorry - not trying to appear sexist here ladies) lifting with all muscles all the time, and works out 3 days at the gym. He starts out at 90 on the scale.
Suppose they develop weakness in the same place at the same time and it progresses at the same rate. Still with me? :-D So by pulling or pushing on muscles the way they do on an exam, doesn't the guy take longer to get to the point of not resisting the neurologist's exam? Same for a toe or heel walk, rising from a chair, etc. So the guy feels more subjective weakness longer and can't do some of the things he used to be able to do, but the clinical says he's fine.
I just keep thinking dang - I've started at 80 and feel weaker, but have not gotten to a point of them being able to measure (believe me - that can be a good thing I know) but if it is a process that is treatable, they won't hardly even get me past a clinical exam before they dismiss me.
This might be too deep for a Monday, but there you go. Something to ponder and give me your thoughts on.
I know docs measure strength on a scale when they do a clinical exam, but it seems impossible for them to really measure strength the way they do until there is profound weakness. Let's invent a scale from 0 to 100.
Patient A is a woman of healthy weight that does not exercise other than normal hard-working daily activities. She might start on the scale at 55.
Patient B is a hard-working construction worker male of healthy weight (sorry - not trying to appear sexist here ladies) lifting with all muscles all the time, and works out 3 days at the gym. He starts out at 90 on the scale.
Suppose they develop weakness in the same place at the same time and it progresses at the same rate. Still with me? :-D So by pulling or pushing on muscles the way they do on an exam, doesn't the guy take longer to get to the point of not resisting the neurologist's exam? Same for a toe or heel walk, rising from a chair, etc. So the guy feels more subjective weakness longer and can't do some of the things he used to be able to do, but the clinical says he's fine.
I just keep thinking dang - I've started at 80 and feel weaker, but have not gotten to a point of them being able to measure (believe me - that can be a good thing I know) but if it is a process that is treatable, they won't hardly even get me past a clinical exam before they dismiss me.
This might be too deep for a Monday, but there you go. Something to ponder and give me your thoughts on.