Will26
New member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2008
- Messages
- 9
- Reason
- Other
- Country
- CA
- State
- Ontario
- City
- Toronto
Hello all,
I've read from a lot of different sources that the shorter life expectancy (18 months?) for bulbar ALS patients is usually attributed to pneumonia due to aspirating liquids. My question is, if you acquire a PEG *before* you risk getting pneumonia through accidental aspiration, wouldn't this extend your survival time to the 3-5 years as seen in the general ALS population? Almost everywhere, it seems to say that Bulbar ALS is fast-spreading, but does it actually SPREAD faster, or is it just that bulbar patients are dying sooner after diagnosis because of their increased risk of getting pneumonia due to aspiration? I've heard that a lot of patients are reluctant to get a PEG until they absolutely can't go on without one, but if all bulbar patients got PEGs way before aspiration was even a risk factor, would this extend survival time to what is generally seen in limb-onset patients?
Will
I've read from a lot of different sources that the shorter life expectancy (18 months?) for bulbar ALS patients is usually attributed to pneumonia due to aspirating liquids. My question is, if you acquire a PEG *before* you risk getting pneumonia through accidental aspiration, wouldn't this extend your survival time to the 3-5 years as seen in the general ALS population? Almost everywhere, it seems to say that Bulbar ALS is fast-spreading, but does it actually SPREAD faster, or is it just that bulbar patients are dying sooner after diagnosis because of their increased risk of getting pneumonia due to aspiration? I've heard that a lot of patients are reluctant to get a PEG until they absolutely can't go on without one, but if all bulbar patients got PEGs way before aspiration was even a risk factor, would this extend survival time to what is generally seen in limb-onset patients?
Will