Neuraltus ALS drug wins fast track, orphan status

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reef

New member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
9
Reason
CALS
Diagnosis
06/2011
Country
US
State
FL
City
Keys
A little more good news....

An experimental treatment for Lou Gehrig’s disease won fast track and orphan drug designations from the Food and Drug Administration, potentially speeding the drug’s development by Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals Inc.: http://onespot.wsj.com/san-francisco/2011/08/31/b899f/neuraltus-als-drug-wins-fast-track-orpha
 
What does that really mean?
 
I will copy and paste a pretty good explanation


"Orphan Drug" status and "Fast Track" designations generally mean the drug will be moved to the open market faster.


"Fast tracking" is allowed by the FDA when drugs in their experimental trial phase vastly exceed expectations and/or the drug works so much better than placebo in the drug's experimental trials that those getting placebo are clearly worse off (that it would be inhumane to give them placebo when the alternative works so much better).


The FDA's drug approval process usually takes many years, and "fast tracking" shortens that time considerably.


So the advantages to fast tracking are:

1. to the drug manufacturer because they have longer patent time to sell the drug without competition
2. to the patients in the general public (who are not in the experimental phase of the drug already) who may potentially need these drugs because they can get their hands on them sooner
3. investors in such drug companies as news like this often causes their stock prices to jump

The major disadvantage is that researchers and the FDA are more likely to overlook rare side effects or other adverse drug events (think Vioxx) that have been rare enough that only time will expose them.

"Orphan drug" status I don't think is as desirable. Orphan drugs are technically drugs that are required but its use will be relatively infrequent (so it's not gonna be a big money-maker). To make this easier to understand, let us say that company XYZ comes up with a drug that treats condition/disease ABC. However, condition ABC only affects, say 50,000 people. It is a legitimate disease, but it is unlikely company XYZ will profit from making the drug to treat this condition ABC. Most companies are truly in business only to make money, so company XYZ really has no reason to produce this drug because it won't make them any money. But what about the 50,000 people who have this disease? Will they be forced to suffer, even though a cure exists? So what the FDA does to remedy this problem is grant company XYZ's drug "orphan drug" status so that it has exclusive patent rights to this drug, AND probably pays the company some kind of grant money or something so that it will offset the losses that XYZ would incur by producing this non-moneymaking drug.
 
Excellent :) Thank you. So...since Neuraltus's NP001 has proven itself, how soon will it be available?
 
It's only in Phase 2, will still have to do a Phase 3. It hasn't been proven yet. There have been a few other drugs that started out looking good, and then were proven to not work. Lithium was one.Talampanel another. I am so very hopeful that this one really will work, but even on fast track, we are looking at at least a couple of years.
 
Thank you for the Orphan Drug explaination! Any chance Dex would be an Orphan? Any insight on it? How many trials does a drug have to go through before it is Orphan or otherwise?
 
Dexpramipexole was given fast track and Orphan Status already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top